concept of the 3D mechanical motion world:
the concept is of a world where objects change position, where they "move" in three dimensional empty "space". if there is no metaphysical truth in this but this is a concept that is so universally known that it barely requires explanation, there is the question of how this came about.
of the basis of this, first, it must have been seen that an object seemed to move. second, it must have seemed that the body could move relative to its surroundings too. and so the initial concept of the 3D mechanical motion world was formed.
CLEARCHARGE
Showing posts with label 3D mechanical motion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 3D mechanical motion. Show all posts
Saturday, August 10, 2013
The World Model Alternatives
the world model alternatives:
"what i could never get around, if what they call the external world were real, was how my senses, you know, my field of vision and sound, was not crashing into other people's senses, if we were truly close together. i mean, i see colour at a distance. if you were standing in front of me, wouldn't that mean the colours i see are somehow inside you, and vice versa?"
"you mean, if your senses, your personal parts, physically extended, and how are they not interfering with people who seem near you?"
"exactly. because i don't see images in my head. i see them truly in front of me at a distance. and then i see the people in front of me. how can the two be in the same place?"
"well, the alternative is, ok, we don't really move around, so to speak, we are not actually near each other, it only seems that, but that we are connected somehow to a system that processes what we see and hear according to the 3D mechanical motion world model that we all know."
CLEARCHARGE
"what i could never get around, if what they call the external world were real, was how my senses, you know, my field of vision and sound, was not crashing into other people's senses, if we were truly close together. i mean, i see colour at a distance. if you were standing in front of me, wouldn't that mean the colours i see are somehow inside you, and vice versa?"
"you mean, if your senses, your personal parts, physically extended, and how are they not interfering with people who seem near you?"
"exactly. because i don't see images in my head. i see them truly in front of me at a distance. and then i see the people in front of me. how can the two be in the same place?"
"well, the alternative is, ok, we don't really move around, so to speak, we are not actually near each other, it only seems that, but that we are connected somehow to a system that processes what we see and hear according to the 3D mechanical motion world model that we all know."
CLEARCHARGE
Monday, January 10, 2011
The Most Popular Theoretical Model
the most popular theoretical model:
the most popular theoretical model that everyone is familiar with is, without doubt, the 3D mechanical motion theoretical model. our eyesight is aligned with this in mind. indeed, the 3D world is projected across our field of vision and we are practised in thinking about it over centuries of life with this the common state of affairs.
this is, of course, the original theoretical model when thinking about the universe. do we have any power over this? well, they do say practice makes perfect. any physical skill requires repetition. the difference from the first time an object is thrown towards a far target to the hundredth or thousandth time may be quite remarkable, from rank lack of coordination to elegant ease.
when two people are together, the stage of life is set. does the other person view me accurately? when i turn to the right, does the other person see thus? when my mood changes, what expression is seen? in an electronic sense, this all requires vast circuitry, does it not?
CLEARCHARGE
the most popular theoretical model that everyone is familiar with is, without doubt, the 3D mechanical motion theoretical model. our eyesight is aligned with this in mind. indeed, the 3D world is projected across our field of vision and we are practised in thinking about it over centuries of life with this the common state of affairs.
this is, of course, the original theoretical model when thinking about the universe. do we have any power over this? well, they do say practice makes perfect. any physical skill requires repetition. the difference from the first time an object is thrown towards a far target to the hundredth or thousandth time may be quite remarkable, from rank lack of coordination to elegant ease.
when two people are together, the stage of life is set. does the other person view me accurately? when i turn to the right, does the other person see thus? when my mood changes, what expression is seen? in an electronic sense, this all requires vast circuitry, does it not?
CLEARCHARGE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)